• External Links:

  • Entries Comments



    Home

    The web home of Scott Burkett: Serial-entrepreneur, tech-geek, dad.

    Blogging, opining, ruminating, and pontificating on entrepreneurship, venture capital, process improvement, technology, online communities, business networking, IT Management, online social networking, and other things that melt in the warm Atlanta sun.

    "Beneath the noble bird, between the proudest words, behind the beauty, cracks appear ..."


    Last One Off the Clue Train is a Rotten Peach!

    23 June, 2009 (11:10) | Atlanta Business Scene, Venture Capital | By: Scott Burkett

    Urvaksh over at the Atlanta Business Chronicle recently published an article providing some coverage of the new $250M fund being launched by the State of Florida.  After reading it, I became engulfed in a sea of emotions, ranging from frustration to anger, finally settling on a mix of sadness and reflection.

    The only thing that can save us now is the passing of time.

    The short version: This new Florida Growth Fund will not only provide capital to venture capital firms (in the form of Florida being an LP – Limited Partner), it will also co-invest (follow, not lead) directly in technology and growth companies.  The fund will be managed by a private equity firm on behalf of the Florida Retirement Pension Fund.

    Georgia is the last state in the Union that does not allow private equity investments out of the state’s pension funds.  “Last.”  Wow.  Now there’s a word that simply emanates innovation.  Nothing says “cutting edge” like being listed as “last”.

    “Last.”  That means that North Dakota is ahead of us in terms of allowing private equity investments from state pension funds.  WTF? Pinch me.

    For all the hemming and hawing we hear from the state government about how great Georgia is for innovation, we’re really doing a pretty lame job of walking the walk, and leading by example.  We can pass a bill that invites the 2009 Georgia Peach Queen to appear before the House of Representatives, and slash the budget of the ATDC, but we can’t drive through a key piece of legislation to propel the Georgia economy into the 21st century.

    “Last”.   You may also recall that Georgia is also “last” (or at least close to being “last”) in another category as well – public education for our children.  It is no coincidence.  We clearly have a remarkably uneducated group of people keeping us from joining the rest of the country in diversifying the state’s investments in the private sector.  Guess that lack of education has already caught up to us.

    Does our state government really take these issues seriously?  Certainly there are some – many of whom I’ve met and had great conversations with.  But as a whole, no.  There are those that are hell bent on laying down in the middle of the street and preventing progress.

    The most common arguments that I hear from opponents of such legislation is that it is “too risky” and “wouldn’t provide much in the way of economic development for anyone but Altanta.”  Humor me for a moment.

    The Georgia Public Policy Foundation, which is a non-profit, independent, public policy think tank, recently published a very interesting article.  In the article, they cite the “lack of diversity” within the investments of the state’s pension funds.   Every investment has risk, but obviously the only defense against market risk is diversification of investments.  “Diversify or die”, as I like to say.  Not diversifying is even riskier. They lay out a pretty compelling case across the board. Read the article – it’s short and worth it.

    With respect to the whole notion that Atlanta would be the sole beneficiary of such investments – that is simply ludicrous.  What these pundits fail to realize is that this is an ecosystem, not a one-way street.  All boats rise with the rising tide.  Would those dollars necessarily create direct jobs in rural areas?  Probably not, or certainly not that many.  Companies that attract venture capital and private equity investment tend to be fast-growth and/or high-tech companies, and those require infrastructure and a large labor force.  And those things exist in abundance in Atlanta, but few other places within the state.  But, what those investment dollars would do is create an economic return for the state.  And those additional dollars eventually make their way into port projects in Savannah, highways, schools, agricultural programs, and other projects around the state. Viewing this issue through any other prism is negligent in my view.

    Normally, I would tell everyone reading this to contact your local state representative or senator, and tell them why you think passing legislation to allow the state to invest in private equity funds would be a good thing.  But we’ve all done that already.  Several times (SB80, HR249, etc).  I tire of the whole thing.

    The only thing that can save us now is the passing of time, and the hope that at some point, enough rational people are voted into office to get us back on the right track.

    “Last”.  I hate being last, don’t you?

    Cheers.

    Thoughts on Shotput Ventures

    23 December, 2008 (13:26) | Uncategorized | By: Scott Burkett

    If you are seeking early-stage capital in Georgia, and haven’t heard about this by now, you should check out what Sanjay Parekh, David Cummings, Allen Graber, Suleman Ali, Wayt King, and David Wright are doing with Shotput Ventures.

    You can read more about it on their web site, but basically it is a clone (or close fascimile) of Y-Combinator.   They will invest $5K per team and $5K per founder into an idea, then provide you with additional resources and coaching to help bring your idea to fruition.

    There has been some debate as to whether or not this investment model makes sense here in Georgia.  Personally, I think that it does, with some caveats.

    Who it is good for: Young, aspiring technology entrepreneurs that can quickly prototype an idea into a tangible product or service.

    Who Isn’t a Good Fit (IMHO): This list is a bit longer …

    • Entrepreneurs that aren’t really entrepreneurs but are looking for a “job”, or individuals that think $250K (or even $100K) is a valid salary for a startup founder here.
    • Entrepreneurs that are still trying to apply antiquated business school methods to startups (i.e. those who think pre-money valuations on pre-product, pre-revenue companies is anything over $250-500K)
    • Entrepreneurs who still think that it takes $2-5M to get an idea off the ground (see above)
    • Entrepreneurs in non-technology or capital intensive industries (manufacturing, nano-tech, bio-tech, and many/most consumer product plays)

    Given that Atlanta has a nice cluster of (younger) idea-oriented technology/software-minded innovators, I think this model has a lot of applicability here.  The metrics make sense to me.  Short time-to-market, quick iterations, fail fast, and move on.  Time will tell, of course, but I’d bet on success.

    There have been several successful exits from Y-Combinator companies.  They have proven the model that small investments can create large returns, especially in the web/software space.

    I’m sure the founders might have some other thoughts, but these are mine.  Back to work now …

    Cheers.

    Capital Lounge Update

    19 August, 2008 (13:55) | Atlanta Business Scene | By: Scott Burkett

    Our next Capital Lounge event is next Wednesday, 8/27, and man is it shaping up to be a good one.

    As it stands right now, this will be the best investor turn out to date (due I think in large part to the success we’ve had with our Angel Lounge initiative). Right now we have over 40 investors signed up, and that number will probably drive closer to 50 in the next few days. There is a slight edge in the number of angel investors, but it is pretty evenly split between angels and traditional venture capital firms.

    Over 150 entrepreneurs have signed up as well, and about half of them are new deals. Very cool to see that trend continue.

    Of course, we try very diligently to weed out service providers, job seekers, etc. in order to create an environment conducive to having substantive discussions between innovators and capital providers.

    if you want to meet the movers and shakers in the startup community (ATDC, VentureLab, regional VCs, local angels, and a veritable army of fellow entrepreneurs), you need to be there. And why not? It’s free.

    We’re going to be making some cool announcements there as well. ;)

    As a reminder, we are capping attendance (for entrepreneurs, at least). So if you haven’t applied, and you want to attend, you should probably apply sooner rather than later.

    Cheers.

    Standing at the Crossroads in the ATL

    2 August, 2008 (00:02) | Atlanta Business Scene | By: Scott Burkett

    The crossroads — a place where two roads cross at or about at right angles, otherwise known as “the forks of the road” — is a metaphor used in religious and folkloric belief all around the world. From the legend of the delta blues guitarist Tommy Johnson (no, not Robert Johnson, as some believe), who sold his soul to the devil at the crossroads, in exchange for other-worldly guitar playing skills, to the ancient Mayans to Robert Frost’s “The Road Not Taken”, the concept of the crossroads has been used to depict a “deciding moment” or “turning point” in life.

    I think we’ve arrived at the crossroads in Atlanta, as it pertains to the early-stage venture scene. This is probably going to be a long post, so be forewarned.

    Read more »

    VC Outlook from Draper Portage

    24 June, 2008 (09:19) | Entrepreneurship, Venture Capital | By: Scott Burkett

    Matt McCall (Draper Portage Ventures) wrote a very interesting post yesterday. In it, he describes the current venture capital landscape as having “flatlined”. Matt is an ultra bright, fairly conservative venture capitalist (at least he was way back when Portage was a key investor in one of my past lives – MetalMaker). A good read if you are currently launching a startup, and/or you are seeking funding for one.

    I’m certainly not an economist, but I will say this: things could certainly be better. The job market sucks, the housing market is nonexistent in many places, and we’re staring $5 gasoline in the face. But how does it really affect the capital-seeking early-stage entrepreneur? It doesn’t sound like this is a particularly compelling time to start a new venture. Possibly, but not necessarily.

    I founded my last company in 2000 – unless you were living on a deserted island then, you will remember how nasty the market was. Nevertheless, through persistence and self-funding, I managed to keep the thing going until I could exit (2005 – when the market was more in my favor). Timing is everything, as they say. Granted, the exit wasn’t overly lucrative, but we made money, and no one got hurt in the process.

    I do want to point out one thing, though (and Mike and I are going to discuss this a bit in our podcast recording session later today). If you are an entrepreneur that is banking on someone else’s funding to help you to build, launch, and realize your dream – your expectations were probably out of line to begin with, so now it gets doubly hard for you. I see deals like this all the time (as do most investors):

    Acme Software provides a world-changing solution to the way consumers shop online! Our cutting-edge, paradoxical approach to e-commerce will drive us to $1B in revenues in just 24 months. Seeking $5M to hire a team, build out the product, and start selling it.

    Sorry, not gonna cut it. This is laughable. Telling an investor that “with my time and your money, all things are possible” is not a value proposition. If anything, it a nice fat red flag to any serious investor that you aren’t a bankable jockey (rightly or wrongly – this is the reality).
    A tough capital market makes the second mile on your journey possibly more arduous – however, the first mile should not be affected. Innovate, sell, and meet the investors halfway.

    In an underserved market like Atlanta, you are not likely to waltz in and secure a first round of capital with an idea alone (save for the occasional angel that truly gets what you are doing). Even if you have a prototype product, your chances may only marginally better. So guess what? Nothing has really changed for you. However, once people are buying what you’re selling, the opportunity will stand out like a diamond in the rough. This is your challenge.

    If Acme came in with this pitch, however, things get interesting:

    Acme Software’s beta product currently provides over 50,000 consumers with a very unique way to shop online. For the first 12 months after launch, the company generated revenues of $1M, and we’re now at cash-flow break-even. Seeking $2M to expand our product and to expand our sales efforts.

    When markets get tough, investors withdraw. Their margin for error is already small, and it gets even smaller in tight markets (true for most entrepreneurs as well). However, entrepreneurs are in a slightly different position. They have the “x factor” – the gene. The thing that makes them drive for success even through the toughest of times. The thing that separates mid-level Fortune 1,000 managers from someone who will try the unthinkable. When the landscape sucks, it actually drives innovation and resourcefulness even further. A blessing in disguise to a serious entrepreneur. Not the same for investors – they are often content to ride out the storm – as well they should, since they are most likely investing someone else’s money. But if your deal represents a chance to return even a mild multiple in a tough market, you may find takers.

    Good deals get funding … still. They likely always will. But proving yourself to be a “good deal” could be getting a lot harder if you are on the uber-early end of the spectrum. So adjust your expectations if you need to, then get out there, execute, and don’t worry about things you can’t control. Turn a bad market into an opportunity to move forward, while many others sit on the sidelines. If you can’t (or aren’t willing to) do this, you are most likely going to find the next 12 months to be a colossal waste of your time, energy, and precious capital.

    Of course, if your venture is already off and running, Matt serves up some pretty good advice to try and insulate yourself. Good reading, for sure.

    Cheers.

    Chrysalis Nails Down $163M Fund IV

    28 February, 2008 (14:32) | Atlanta Business Scene, Venture Capital | By: Scott Burkett

    Our good friends up at Chrysalis Ventures in Kentucky just locked up their 4th fund – a nice $163M warchest. If you are an Atlanta entrepreneur, and you don’t know Chrysalis – you need to, especially if you are in the healthcare, media, or business services sectors. These guys are big supporters of our efforts with StartupLounge.com and our Capital Connections events, and they are in Atlanta early and often looking for deals.

    Cheers.

    SB 80: A Critical Piece of Legislation

    13 February, 2008 (15:23) | Atlanta Business Scene | By: Scott Burkett

    If you are serious about pushing change here in Atlanta/Georgia around early-stage investing, I would encourage you to read this and do your part to help!

    The House Retirement committee will take a vote on SB 80, the bill to allow the employee retirement system to invest in certain types of alternate investments. Please email the members of the committee encouraging them to support this bill. Most effective would be a short email stating that this bill will put Georgia in step with the 49 other states on this issue and that it will be positive for economic development and job creation in Georgia.

    Read more »