<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Calacanis on Paying-to-Pitch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottburkett.com/index.php/entrepreneurship/2009-10-09/calacanis-on-paying-to-pitch.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottburkett.com/index.php/entrepreneurship/2009-10-09/calacanis-on-paying-to-pitch.html</link>
	<description>Blogging, opining, ruminating, and pontificating on entrepreneurship, venture capital, process improvement, technology, online communities, business networking, IT Management, online social networking, and other things that melt in the warm Atlanta sun.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 01:53:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: scott edward walker</title>
		<link>http://www.scottburkett.com/index.php/entrepreneurship/2009-10-09/calacanis-on-paying-to-pitch.html/comment-page-1#comment-139071</link>
		<dc:creator>scott edward walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottburkett.com/?p=1059#comment-139071</guid>
		<description>As a corporate attorney representing entrepreneurs, I generally agree in principle with Jason’s position that it is “inappropriate and predatory” for angel groups to charge entrepreneurs fees to pitch them; however, I think it is important to distinguish among the different angel groups and their respective practices.  Indeed, if (i) the fees are reasonable/de minimis and are adequately disclosed and (ii) the angel group is providing a legitimate service to entrepreneurs, there may be compelling reasons to support such a fee-based service.  That’s why I have strongly recommended in my recent blog post (see http://bit.ly/hAYeu) that Jason Calacanis and John Dilts (the founder and President of Maverick Angels, LLC and an attorney) meet face-to-face and have a live debate (in the great American tradition), which can be shown on the web to all interested parties via Ustream.  Many thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a corporate attorney representing entrepreneurs, I generally agree in principle with Jason’s position that it is “inappropriate and predatory” for angel groups to charge entrepreneurs fees to pitch them; however, I think it is important to distinguish among the different angel groups and their respective practices.  Indeed, if (i) the fees are reasonable/de minimis and are adequately disclosed and (ii) the angel group is providing a legitimate service to entrepreneurs, there may be compelling reasons to support such a fee-based service.  That’s why I have strongly recommended in my recent blog post (see <a href="http://bit.ly/hAYeu)" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/hAYeu)</a> that Jason Calacanis and John Dilts (the founder and President of Maverick Angels, LLC and an attorney) meet face-to-face and have a live debate (in the great American tradition), which can be shown on the web to all interested parties via Ustream.  Many thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.scottburkett.com/index.php/entrepreneurship/2009-10-09/calacanis-on-paying-to-pitch.html/comment-page-1#comment-138732</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 02:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottburkett.com/?p=1059#comment-138732</guid>
		<description>I loved the post too.  Sadly, we have been unable to stamp out the pay-to-pitch model in Atlanta, (although I think we have undermined it) and that post is a nice reminder that we need to be vigilant, and we need to constantly be seeking opportunities to steer potential users of such groups to more legitimate (and *free*) capital raising methods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the post too.  Sadly, we have been unable to stamp out the pay-to-pitch model in Atlanta, (although I think we have undermined it) and that post is a nice reminder that we need to be vigilant, and we need to constantly be seeking opportunities to steer potential users of such groups to more legitimate (and *free*) capital raising methods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
